I've been reading your entries and comments. It is obvious that this is new territory for some of you and more familiar to others. I am interested in your responses to my observations.
First, when I read the Steve Jobs opinion entries and the Organizational Memo entries, they seem very different in tone and directness. Specifically, the Steve Jobs opinion pieces took clear positions without concern for what readers might think. The Organizational Memos seemed more tentative and generic. Do you see the same thing I see? If so, why do you think that is?
Second, some entries are definitely better written than others. Some are weaker in the grammar, spelling and flow of thought than others. Yet, everyone basically gives everyone else favorable feedback. Once again, do you see the same thing? If so, why do think that is?